Misc. Iraq Postings – 5


Analysis of Secty St Powell's proposals re Iraq and suggestions for action.

Forwarded by Carolyn Scarr
===========================

"Three baskets"

Dear Friends,

For several years, VitW (Voices in the Wilderness) members have enacted a simple skit in which a woman dressed in black stands before an audience olding an empty basket. Two readers alternate reading UN statements about conditions in Iraq under sanctions. As each statement is read, an audience member walks forward, picks up a brick, and places it in the basket. When the sixth brick is added to her load, she falls to the ground, with a piercing cry.

Last week, Secretary of State Colin Powell proposed "three baskets" to designate plans for future US relations with Iraq. We welcome Mr. Powell's readiness to heed the alarmed concerns for Iraqi people voiced by Arab leaders with whom he recently met. However, we must immediately challenge him to recognize that each basket he proposes amounts to a ton of bricks heaped upon Iraqi civilians whose cries of anguish have been muted by US State Department strategies. (See the end of this letter for suggested campaign actions).

Aiming to reassess an Iraq policy which he said "was falling apart," Secretary Powell suggested new policy would come in "three baskets": Sanctions, No-Fly Zones, and "Regime Change." Our sum-up of the basket contents is deprivation (sanctions), violence (ongoing bombardment) and covert action (regime change.)

Be warned: Secretary Powell's vision for the future of US Iraq policy holds no apology for the suffering and destruction caused by the sanctions; we don't detect special attention directed to humanitarian and economic concerns of Iraqi people. But this simply means we must work harder to continue developing analysis, education, and action!

Basket One: Sanctions.

Secretary Powell is desperate to resucitate the dying sanctions regime and bring "the coalition" back together. He has begun by bringing back to life dying myths about Iraq and US policy. In a salute to his predecessor, Madeleine Albright, Mr. Powell boldly told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday that "(Saddam Hussein) is hurting the Iraqi people, not us. There is more than enough money available to the regime now to take care of the needs they have." In fact, all of the money Iraq earns through the UN oil-for-food program goes into an escrow account controlled by the UN Security Council. Some of the surplus funds in this account are the result of logjams created by Security Council refusal to approve certain contracts.

It's no surprise to learn that huge profits are derived from smuggling and black market profiteering when sanctions create intense desperation for needed goods. We should be scandalized whenever any government fails to spend its revenues on meeting human needs. However, whatever hard currency the Iraqi government has accrued through the illegal smuggling of oil and other goods, even if applied to infrastructure repair and other societal needs, could not begin to pay the estimated 100 billion dollars needed to rehabilitate Iraq's shattered economy. Large scale investments of public and private monies are needed to repair the electrical facilities which are necessary for water treatment. The agricultural, health care, education, and industrial development sectors need massive financial investments.

Mr. Powell says he hopes to "change the nature of the debate." He is deeply concerned that "We are being accused and we are taking on the burden of hurting Iraqi people, hurting Iraqi children." A logical first step for the Secretary of State would be to take a meaningful look at the facts behind the accusations, thoroughly documented by UN coordinators on the ground in Iraq. Mr. Powell could seek the interpretation and advice of former UN Humanitarian Coordinators in Iraq, Mr. Denis Halliday and Mr. Hans von Sponeck, who have laid out very specific and informed alternatives to the deprivation and violence of the current policy. Unfortunately, Mr. Powell's current vision seems limited to what appears to be intensified propaganda to obscure the overwhelming evidence of U.S. culpability in the ongoing humanitarian disaster in Iraq.

Basket Two: No-Fly Zones

In his testimony, Mr. Powell used the basket breakdown to isolate U.N. policy (sanctions) from U.S. policy (No-Fly Zones and Regime Change). Previously, no pro-sanctions politician and few journalists have made this distinction. The No-Fly Zones violate international law and are not mandated by any U.N. Resolution. Weekly bombings in the North and South of Iraq by U.S. and British planes have regularly missed their targets, wounding and killing civilians and destroying homes, flocks, and businesses.

Mr. Powell clarified that the new administration is reviewing the policy, but he also wanted the Iraqi regime to understand that "we reserve the right to strike militarily any activity out there, any facility we find that is inconsistent with their obligations to get rid of weapons of mass destruction." If the recent bombing on the outskirts of Baghdad is any indication, this means we can anticipate many more guided missiles and illegal cluster bombs missing their mark and further terrorizing the Iraqi people. It appears that the new administration has decided to substitute bombs for weapons inspectors.

Basket Three: Regime Change

The third major basket, "regime change" carries on a supposed objective of the Clinton administration. Mr. Powell has released more funds to the Iraqi National Congress, an opposition group that claims it can pose a challenge to Iraq's government. "Hopefully," said Mr. Powell, "we will see a regime change that will be better for the world." The U.S. could begin creating conditions within the Middle East that are better for the world by ending its weapon sales to every country in the region. Should the U.S. want to help Iraq move toward more democratic governing structures, it should help Iraq strengthen its education, communication, and social service systems, and help Iraqis to build a strong and well educated middle class.

------------

What you can do:

1. Call your congressperson and ask that he or she support the Humanitarian Exports Leading to Peace Act (HR 742 - the H.E.L.P. ACT) introduced by Representative Conyers. Consult EPIC's website, www.saveageneration.org for information about the bill (go to the Talking Points section of the website and then to Epic Briefs--Epic refers to the bill as HR 3825 on their website, but the bill has been reintroduced with a new number HR 742.) This bill holds real promise and deserves vigorous support.

2. Help us gain signers for a sign-on letter that will be distributed to faith-based, humanitarian, and human rights groups, calling on President Bush to terminate the sanctions and help facilitate the capital investment required to enable the Government of Iraq to rebuild its infrastructure. The letter is posted on our website at www.nonviolence.org/vitw. President Bush has said he wants to work with faith based groups. Let us make sure he hears from hundreds of faith based groups regarding their belief that the sanctions must end. We’re blest with a group of students who are spending their spring break with us, poised and ready to contact faith based groups and seek their signatures to this letter. Please let us know, (soon!) if you or your group are prepared to sign on to this letter and if you have any contacts with whom you think we should be in touch.

All good wishes from all of us on Carmen Avenue.

Sincerely,

Lauren Cannon, Jeff Guntzel, Laurie Hasbrook, Tom Jackson, Kathy Kelly, and Danny Muller

p.s. Tom Walsh found the job of his dreams and is working through Loyola U. for economic justice as regards housing opportunities in Chicago. We miss him as much as we thank him.


Dear Friends,

As Secretary of State Colin Powell approaches the Bush administration to suggest an easing of economic sanctions against Iraq, let us pressure elected reps and media contacts to emphasize the need for massive investments of funds, equipment and expertise to help Iraq rebuild its infrastructure and re-establish fair trade in a post-embargo period.

Please visit our website and read comments of Mr. Denis Halliday and Mr. Hans von Sponeck, both former UN coordinators of humanitarian programs in Iraq. Use their comments to develop talking points regarding alternatives to sanctions. There you can also find a sketch of details regarding rehabilitation of Iraq’s infrastructure, specifically as regards electric power production, potable water, sanitation, health care, agriculture and education. It’s important to emphasize that cosmetic changes in the current sanctions regime won’t enable Iraq to overcome the deadly impact of the past decade’s economic warfare and bombardment.

Call or write your congressperson and Senator to urge briefings on Capitol Hill by experts who have experience ‘on the ground’ with UN programs in Iraq.

Ask your local media to carefully scrutinize Mr. Powell’s recommendations, as they develop, and examine how these proposals could realistically meet the humanitarian needs of Iraqi people.

Ask your elected representatives and local media to carefully consider recent UN documentation of contracts for items requested by the Government of Iraq and put on hold during Phase VII of the "oil for food" deal. We’ll post the listing on our website, but let us know if you’d like it faxed to you immediately. A majority of the items are medicines, medical equipment, medical machines and medical appliances.

Insist that Iraqi people shouldn’t be reduced to living in a welfare state, reliant on handouts. Let Mr. Powell know that we advocate peaceful relations with Iraq, an end to US airstrikes and use of cluster bombs (cluster bombs don’t destroy radar stations!), a lifting of the sanctions against Iraq and an embargo on military sales to the entire region.

Thanks in advance for making these contacts:

US Sec. of State Colin Powell
US Department of State
2202 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Tel. 202-647-4000
Fax: 202-261-8577
      President George Bush
the White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 205000
202-456-2580
The Honorable (full name)
US House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
      Senator (full name)
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

That link is Voices in the Wilderness

The letter referred to follows below.

EXPLORE
 THE NONVIOLENCE WEB


Voices in the Wilderness
A Campaign to End the Economic Sanctions Against the People of Iraq


Questions and Answers: II. Regarding Alternatives to Sanctions and Suggested Post-Embargo Plans

Regarding the contention that those who oppose sanctions offer no alternative, we quote from a letter of Denis Halliday, UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq 1997-98 and HC von Sponeck, Humanitarian Coordinator 1998-2000 printed in The Guardian, Jan 8, 2001:

This is false.

Both of us, for example,  have said time and again that the UN security council should delink economic sanctions from the disarmament debate while imposing arms controls on Iraq and those countries which wish to sell arms to Baghdad, keeping in mind resolution 687, paragraph 14, which calls for the establishment in the Middle East of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction.

We have argued that the hidden agenda of hardline geo-strategic interests be dropped and a dialogue be started;

Regarding the post-embargo rebuilding of Iraq, below are recommendations listed by Mr. Denis Halliday – February 13 2000

The member states of the UN Security Council must immediately TERMINATE THE ECONOMIC EMBARGO.  The strangle-hold of the Sanctions Committee must end. The economy must be free of UN interference and be urgently rebuilt.  The health and agriculture sectors must be revitalised.  The highest levels of education need to be reestablished.  Men and women must be able to earn a decent living again.  Employment opportunities need to be created.  Income levels need to be restored. Inflation needs to be stopped and the dinar strengthened.  Consumer goods, food processing and other forms of manufacturing must be reestablished.  In summary, the whole economic and social spectrum needs to be addressed in depth and with speed.

a. The AGRICULTURE SECTOR will require special focus so that never again will Iraq be vulnerable to importation of basic foodstuffs.  Food security in the future must be a top priority. 
Irrigated systems will need investment.  New land will need to be opened and sustained.  Farmers will need subsidies and support.  Good water management will be critical, particularly in the context of endangered levels of water in the Tigris and the Euphrates.  Reservoirs and water catchment areas will need to be further developed.  It would appear to me that greater self-sufficiency in all aspects of agricultural production – from pesticides to fertilizers, from cereals to animal husbandry – would serve the best interests of Iraq. The over dependency on oil exports and massive importation of foodstuffs creates a vulnerability to be avoided in the future.  Heavy capital investment would appear to be essential.

b. The HEALTH SECTOR likewise requires huge capital outlay to restore rural clinics and urban hospitals throughout the country.  People all over the country need to have their confidence restored in the public health care system in order to bring control over epidemics, water borne disease, anemia and malnutrition.

c.  The WATER SECTOR requires the rebuilding of treatment and distribution systems throughout the country.  Without this restoration, unacceptable high child mortality is likely to continue.  The reestablishment and expansion of urban sanitation systems is equally important.

d. The quality of EDUCATION needs to be restored – primary, secondary and tertiary.  Teachers and professors need to be returned to their students. Class rooms, laboratories and space for computer science will need attention.  Much capital investment will be needed.  Iraqi investment in people, and the future, will need to be revitalised.  The intellectual embargo must be terminated.  Overseas studies will need to be facilitated once again.

e. Perhaps above all other reconstruction prerequisites, is the need to restore the capacity of Iraq to produce and distribute ELECTRIC POWER through its once effective national grid. Agriculture, health care, water and sanitation are all greatly dependent on the availability of cheap electric power.

f. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT is fundamental to an economy that will be part of the global economy, but will want to remain free and independent of its greed, its exploitation of cheap labour and its pressures leading to environmental negligence.  Iraq will need to participate while at the same time protecting its integrity from the corruption and dangers of superficial opportunities.

g. And we cannot overlook the ENVIRONMENT, in particular the damage caused by the Gulf War together with ten long years of UN embargo, minimal protection and maintenance during this period.  Investment will be required to clean up waters such as the Shatt al Arab, the Tigris, the Euphrates and offshore areas of the Gulf.

h. Likewise, we cannot forget DEPLETED URANIUM, used during the Gulf War by UN allies, and remaining toxic even today in the debris of war, in the soil, and in the water of the South.  Depleted Uranium – DU residue is going to demand special international scientific attention.  A truly independent enquiry into usage by the US and the UK during the Gulf War must be undertaken.  The world must understand the crimes committed, but even more importantly, the global medical profession must assist with combating current and long term effects.  The human damage is already apparent, now a way  must be found to guard against yet more damage, more lost lives, in the future.

We have seen horrific increase in cancers throughout child and adult hospitals, and in particular the increases in Basra and the southern parts of the country.  We have seen the horror of birth defects, and the evidence of medical complications never before seen in this country.  The use of DU when it impacts on civilians constitutes a crime against humanity; a crime for which Britain and the USA will have to answer.  When Iraq is ready, and in addition to prosecution, the issue of compensation for lives destroyed and families maimed should be pursued by the United Nations

i. BANKING, INTERNET LINKS and the TELECOMMUNICATIONS and TRANSPORTATION SECTORS will need to be rebuilt, improved and expanded.  A modern economy must be driven forward – designed to raise the well being of all Iraqis, both urban and rural.  Small towns and villages will need to keep apace with Baghdad and other cities.  FULL EMPLOYMENT and effective INCOME DISTRIBUTION  during the difficult years of economic recovery, and then during success and prosperity, will need to be managed well. Investment and focus on RURAL areas will be needed to avoid urban drift.

j. From my experience working in Iraq, I believe that the expertise to meet all these demands resides amongst the ministers and technocrats of government departments.  However,
there is also an important human resource overseas.  I refer to the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Professionals Overseas who fled the embargo in order to take care of their families.  I have met such Iraqis in Australia, in Canada, in Ireland and elsewhere.  And I know that they are highly regarded overseas, but I believe that most would like to go home to rejoin their extended families.  And to play a part in the recovery of the Iraqi economy.

How is all of this to be accomplished?  I have mentioned the need for both recurring expenditures and capital investment.  Recurring Budgetary costs of the country will presumably have to be met from oil export revenues, maximized when spare parts and equipment for new wells become available. Debt relief will need to be sought from those countries supportive of Iraqi recovery.  When Iraqi is ready, OPEC should be urged to approve, as an exceptional measure, an increase in Iraq’s global export-share in recognition of urgent needs and in acknowledgment of ten years of lost revenue.

Apart from recurring expenditures, it seems clear that massive CAPITAL INVESTMENT will be needed.  I assume those in government planning have such investment needs calculated, but it would appear to be in excess of US $100 billion.  And it needs to be available immediately the embargo is removed, if not before, in order to expand oil production, rebuild and enhance electric power and distribution capacity,  water treatment and distribution systems.  Urban sanitation needs and the restoration of agricultural irrigation systems, animal health and production will be required.

Likewise, capital investment will be needed for health care, education, agriculture, telecommunications, transportation and urban and rural reconstruction.

2. But first, the US and the UK must end their illegal “NO-FLY ZONE” bombing attacks on the north and south of Iraq.  There is no UN provision, including Resolution 688, calling for the continuous bombing of Iraq.  It has resulted in the death of hundreds of civilians.  It terrorizes the children of the country.  It constitutes war and it must stop.  I understand in Washington and within the US Air Force, there are many reservations about the no-fly zone bombing policy.  Certainly, all the members of the Security Council, but for the UK and the US, have condemned it.

3. Although it is an Iraqi domestic issue, and a sensitive one, I want to remind listeners of the need to accelerate peaceful reunification with the northern governorates.  Despite the fact that the Kurds as an ethnic group have been used and betrayed since the fall of the Ottoman Empire by the British, the Iranians, and more recently the USA, there remains European Community and international concern for their well being.  I mention this concern, knowing full well that the Kurds of Iraq have also suffered terribly under the economic embargo maintained by these same countries. They appear to be unaware of the loss of life and malnutrition amongst Kurdish children, and adults, due to the embargo for which they are responsible.

Despite all the difficulties of the past, I believe that the Kurds of the northern governorates need to be treated with tolerance.  Baghdad needs to continue to respond to their economic and other needs, as the UN embargo crumbles and Iraq continues to expand its international dialouge.  This would be consistent with the present commitment of Baghdad to the social, linguistic, educational and cultural rights of Iraqi Kurds.

4. The fear of WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, including chemical and biological, continues.  Today, Iraq is surrounded by countries heavily armed with modern conventional weapons, and some with weapons of mass destruction. Despite the statements of former disarmament inspector Mr. Scott Ritter that Iraq has no such WMD weapons capacity, the politics of the US-driven Security Council appear to require the certainty of that condition.  Despite the double standards of the Council in respect to disarmament within the Region, the need for certainty needs to be dealt with by Iraq in order to hasten the lifting of the embargo.   And I say this, despite legitimate concerns about Iraqi national sovereignty, the right to man its borders and its apparent defensive vulnerability today.

After ten long years, Resolution 1284 and its possibility of suspending the embargo is moot.  Monitoring can be carried out under existing non-proliferation treaty provisions by the IAEA and other international bodies as appropriate.  This should be conditional on the implementation of paragraph 14 of Resolution 687 which calls for the removal of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, from all countries of the Region. However, let us hope that the Security Council and the European Community, will begin to end the application of double standards on this matter, and begin to take nuclear and other disarmament decisions compatible with the UN charter and international law.

5. It is clearly in the best interests of good relations that Iraq continue to reassure the people of Kuwait of its good intentions.  Likewise, Kuwait must stop US bombers using it as a base from which to attack and kill innocent Iraqis.  The Turks and the Saudis must do likewise.  In this connection, Iraq will want to continue searching for the missing 605 Kuwaiti people, much as Kuwait must search for the 1040 missing Iraqis.

It is encouraging to see the ever growing dialouge and cooperation between Iraq and neighbours such as Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Iran.

6. There must be an immediate suspension by the UN of Compensation Payments, using oil-for food revenues, in respect of all claimants as long as a single Iraqi child, or adult dies unnecessarily.  And then the entire compensation issue needs an independent international examination in order to address, inter alia, legal applications, the use of double standards by the Security Council in regard to the compensation that other states in the Region might be expected to pay.

[Voices in the Wilderness]
=========================
Voices in the Wilderness
A Campaign to End the Economic Sanctions Against thePeople of Iraq




Maintained by Chuck Quilty, cquilty@juno.com
Page created  February 18, 2001,  Chuck Quilty, VITW


Forwarded by Carolyn Scarr-----

A very interesting article which sheds some light on the history of the establishment of the No-Fly Zones.
========================

I believe that it would be important to comment on UN Security Council Resolution 688 which is the base for those No-Fly Zones according to the US and the UK.

First of all, resolution 688 was adopted upon protests by Turkey and Iran of the large number of refuges entering their territories after the military operations. This surge of refuge- seekers already started as a result of allied bombing activities which did not spare the north of Iraq. As an example, the Zakho bridge linking Iraq to Turkey was bombed early on in the military actions, without anyone understanding what bombing it has to do with the alleged objective of liberating Kuwait…. The resolution also refers to "crossborder incursions", which means that there were also Turkish incursions inside Iraq… According to Colin Powell in a televised interview,the US had a contingency plan to blow up dams located in the north of Iraq to flood central Iraq, estimating losses to be at about 1 million civilians. This does not show that the US cared for the Human Rights of the Kurdish people….

France also sent a letter to the SC, originated by the wife of President Mitterand, who had become a human rights activist. Of course, Mrs. Mitterand did not think of the human rights of the Alegrians killed by French troops when her husband was the butcher of Algeria…

Unlike all other resolutions related to Iraq, resolution 688 is NOT based on Chapter VII of the Charter of the UN, nor on any previous resolution related to Iraq, and its implementation does not therefore have the automatic authorization for the use of force given by Chapter VII. In fact this resolution is based on Article 2, paragraph 7 of the Charter of the UN, which states:
"Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII".

I believe that those Members who voted for this resolution, did so with an understanding that it will not be enforced. But they did not realize that the US was using the vague wording of the Charter and Resolutions to serve its interests.

The resolution also reaffirms the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of Iraq and of all States in the area. Preventing Iraq from flying in its air-space, flying over Iraq, or bombing its radar facilities and installations is a definite violation of this specific resolution and of the Charter of the UN.

Most important, the Resolution, though politically motivated and adopted in the peak of US control of the UN and its decision making, does not, in any of its articles, authorize the use of force or the creation of flight exclusion zones.

As our friend Elias Davidson wrote, Iraq is entitled to war reparations under international law, not only for the war crimes committed during the military activities of 1991, but also for any and all activities committed since that date whether in the establishing of the No-Fly Zones, or in participating and supporting US-UK aggression against Iraq.

Peace
GIS
-------------------
George Isacsson is Scandinavian. He is an Architect by profession, holding a Ph.D., but has done extensive research and studies on Middle East affairs, and has lived some time in some Arab countries.

Forwarded by Rania Masri
please vote, and pass it on.
========================

http://www.vote.com/vote/26824687/index.phtml?cat=4075633

If you can't get this site by clicking on the above, then go to www.vote.com and look to the right side of the page.

The heading will be Active Votes

Come down to the 5th question which is

          "US and British planes strike Iraq:
          Do you support the attack?"

The vote is 89% in favor of the attack.

Please while this vote is active, get there immediately and pass this message on.

Betty


Back to the Directory